Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Site Plans topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves multiple home site plans with contingencies, continues one; nominates new chair

3380338 · April 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Genola Planning Commission approved several residential site plans with conditions, continued one application for missing information and voted to forward a nomination for commission chair to the mayor for appointment.

The Genola Planning Commission on its April meeting approved several residential site plans with specific contingencies, continued one application for missing plan details and voted to forward a nominee for commission chair to the mayor for appointment.

Commissioners approved new-home and accessory-building site plans for multiple property owners — including C.J. and Lisa Park; Tyler and Marissa Mitchell; Jason and Anna Maria Weaver; Reed/Jacqueline (applicant listed as Reed Jacqueline in the packet); Caden Pardon; and the Bowers Family Trust — while continuing an addition for Kevin and Lori Carter until missing measurements are supplied. The commission also voted to forward a nomination for a new chair (Avery) to the mayor for formal appointment.

The approvals were typically conditional. The commission required that several applicants add or clarify plan details before a final stamp of approval: one approval required verification that the front setback be shown as 35 feet from the property line and 75 feet from the centerline of the road; another required the applicant to label existing gas lines; a different approval required the applicant to add a dimension showing distance to a fire hydrant; and Weaver’s accessory-building approval required clarifying the location/handling of a gas line. The Carter home-addition application was continued after commissioners found multiple missing items on the submitted plan and asked the applicants to return with a corrected set.

Votes at a glance - Approval: Minutes for March 6, 2025. Motion made and seconded; vote recorded as all in favor. Outcome: approved. - Approval: New home site plan for C.J. and Lisa Park, approximately 625 North 800 East (4B Subdivision, Lot 2). Motion made, seconded; outcome: approved (no additional contingencies reported on the record). - Continued: Home addition for Kevin and Lori Carter, 169 West 800 South (Meekum Subdivision, Lot 6). Commissioners listed multiple missing items (front setback not shown, property line dimensions, easements, aerial view). Motion to continue/bring back at a future meeting was approved. - Approval (contingent): New home for Tyler and Marissa Mitchell, 324 North Main Street (Rustic Roots Subdivision). Motion approved with contingency clarifying front setback (35 ft from property line / 75 ft from centerline of roadway) to be shown on the plan. - Approval (contingent): Accessory building for the Weaver residence (Jason and Anna Maria Weaver), 529 North 470 East (Genoa/Genoa Farm Subdivision, Lot 24). Motion approved with contingency to address/label the gas line on the site plan. - Approval (contingent): Site plan for Reed Jacqueline, 248 South State Road (Draper Farms subdivision). Applicant reported receiving a conditional access permit from UDOT; commission approved with the contingency that missing dimensions for adjacent homes be added to the plan. - Approval (contingent): New home for Caden Pardon, 1677 North Main Street (Valley View Subdivision, Lot 3). Motion approved pending that the gas location be clearly labeled as an existing utility on the plan. - Approval (contingent): Site plan for the Bowers Family Trust (also referenced in the packet as Fowers/Bowers Family Trust), approximately 384 South Main Street (subdivision/lot cited in packet). Motion approved with contingency to add dimension from the property to the indicated fire hydrant. - Administrative motions: The commission voted to table proposed amendments to the subdivision ordinance and to R-1 zoning pending further work and review. - Nomination forwarded: Commissioners nominated and voted to forward a nomination for a new commission chair (Avery) to the mayor for formal appointment. The commission noted the mayor must make the official appointment.

Commissioners handled the routine approvals in standard form: staff or a commissioner moved the motion, another seconded, and the commission verbally recorded “Aye” from members for approval. Where the commission imposed a contingency, staff were directed to ensure the applicants produce revised plans showing the required label, dimension or clarification before the final administrative sign-off.

The approvals will allow a series of single-family residential projects and one accessory building to proceed toward permitting pending the listed corrections. Several items noted on multiple plans were recurring: requirement for a north arrow and scale; property-line dimensions; setback callouts; aerial view of the lot; and clear labeling of existing utilities (notably gas). The commission repeatedly instructed applicants to return with corrected plans rather than approve incomplete submittals without conditions.

The commission also recorded a formal continuation for the Carter addition and tabled draft ordinance changes to give staff time to return with revised language for public hearing and review.

What’s next: Applicants with contingencies must provide the clarified or corrected plan sheets listed on the record before a final administrative sign-off. The nomination for commission chair will be forwarded to the mayor for appointment; the vote taken by the commission is a recommendation, not a final appointment.

Ending: The meeting concluded after the commission completed its agenda and a motion to adjourn passed. Several applicants were told to return with revised plans at a future meeting if they did not meet the contingencies on the record.