Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sight Triangle Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables proposed code amendment tying sight-triangle measurements to AASHTO standard pending engineer input
Summary
The Grantsville Planning Commission on a motion tabled a proposed amendment to chapter 4.16 that would reference AASHTO sight-distance standards for site triangles, asking for an engineering briefing before further action.
Get email alerts on the Sight Triangle Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grantsville Planning Commission voted to table a proposed amendment to chapter 4.16 of the city’s Land Use and Management Code that would reference AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) sight-distance standards for intersection site triangles. The panel said it wants a city engineer or other technical staff to present the standard’s implications before adopting the change.
A public commenter, Gary Pinkham, challenged the completeness of the staff packet and said the proposal’s insertion of a variable AASHTO-based standard created a conflict with the code’s existing paragraph that lists specific sight-distance dimensions. “By putting that somewhat moving target for that AASHTO standard in there, that is in direct contradiction [with the code],” Pinkham said, adding the packet lacked the referenced AASHTO pages. Pinkham and other speakers said they worried the change could lead to inconsistent enforcement and confusion.
Commission discussion centered on two technical concerns. First, commissioners and staff noted that AASHTO sight-distance values depend on assumed vehicle speeds; using AASHTO could require designers to assume longer sight-triangle dimensions on higher-speed roads, which in turn would affect intersection clearances and potentially require changes to street design. Commissioner comments pointed to a practical tension: the AASHTO stopping-distance tables imply longer sight triangles for 25 mph and above, and applying AASHTO could mean either reducing speed limits or widening sight triangles in many existing town intersections.
Second, commissioners said the packet did not include the AASHTO excerpts and that staff had not yet coordinated an engineering presentation. Planning staff said the referenced AASHTO material is a purchased standard not freely included in the packet; staff provided small excerpts but recommended a technical briefing. Several commissioners suggested that the code’s sight-triangle language could be clarified to make enforcement consistent: for example, specifying how parked cars, driveways and sidewalks are treated when measuring triangles.
Commissioner Brett moved to table the item pending an engineer or Shay (online) briefing; the motion passed. Commissioners asked staff to reconvene the item with engineering input and recommended including real-world examples (the West Main/North Wayne intersection was cited) and guidance on how parked cars and driveways should be treated in measurements.
The commission did not alter the draft text at the meeting; it postponed final consideration so engineers can explain how AASHTO sight-distance values would apply to Grantsville’s street network and any consequences for speed limits, developer requirements and enforcement.
