Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners approve $39,900 contract for six Flock Safety license-plate readers funded by asset-forfeiture/JAG funds

6490809 ยท August 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board authorized a $39,900 contract for six license-plate reader cameras from Flock Safety, to be paid from DEA asset forfeiture funds with a possible JAG grant match; contract covers a 24-month initial term and is split across two fiscal years.

Caswell County commissioners voted Aug. 18 to approve a contract with Flock Safety to install six license-plate reader cameras at locations the sheriff's office deems strategically necessary.

County staff said the contract total is $39,900 split across two budget years ' $21,900 in the current fiscal year and $18,000 in the following year. Funding was identified in DEA asset-forfeiture funds, with a Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) noted as a possible alternative source if it is awarded. Staff said forfeiture funds are sufficient to cover the purchase if a grant does not materialize.

County staff discussed the vendor as the preferred option because of the vendor's database and described the cameras as placed at multiple high-traffic locations rather than clustered in a single spot. The contract exhibit page in the packet indicated an initial term of 24 months with a 24-month renewal term.

Commissioner Smith made the motion to approve the contract; Commissioner Totten seconded. The motion was approved by voice vote.

Commissioners asked follow-up questions about the budget split and whether the purchase includes ongoing software or support costs; staff said the proposal lists professional services and that hardware and ongoing software/support appear to be combined in the contract price and that staff would follow up with a detailed breakdown upon request. Staff also said that continued funding beyond the initial term would require future board action if forfeiture funds were not available.