Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews Public Participation and Partners chapter for Olympia 2045; committee and youth feedback shaped revisions
Summary
Senior Planner David Guenther briefed the Olympia City Council on revisions to the Public Participation and Partners chapter, reporting survey results, advisory-committee recommendations and suggested policy edits to broaden outreach and clarify roles for neighborhood and community organizations.
Senior Planner David Guenther presented the Public Participation and Partners chapter of the Olympia 2045 Comprehensive Plan update at the April 15 council study session.
Guenther said the chapter's main points are that public participation opportunities are valued by the community, that all community members have a role to play, and that collaboration and partnerships are essential. He reported an online survey with about 95 participants and said that "overall people thought that the goals and policies in this chapter were in pretty good shape" while respondents asked for clearer reporting on implementation and outcomes.
The Social Justice and Equity Commission recommended strengthening outreach to young people, tailoring outreach methods to different audiences (for example mail, email and social media), and improving representation in chapter photos. Guenther said the chapter includes a new photo of Squaxin Island tribal members and a description of the accord between the Squaxin Island Tribe and the city. He also described briefings to the new Olympia Youth Council and said youth participants used breakout groups to frame questions.
Council members offered specific feedback. Council Member Madrone suggested adding challenges such as persistent disagreement among community members and barriers to participation; she recommended broadening language in PP 3.5 so that the city "partner[s] with recognized neighborhood associations and other organizations in the community." Mayor Pro Tem Nguyen and others asked staff to clarify which kinds of organizations are meant, suggesting "community-based organizations" as an example to include business associations, service providers and nonprofits that convene underrepresented residents.
Council Member Cooper recommended aligning language with the Growth Management Act and keeping the plan's internal consistency in mind, noting that equity language is in the values chapter; Cooper and others suggested avoiding repeated, exhaustive lists of demographic groups across multiple chapters. Council Member Gilman emphasized the difference between including people who "look like" impacted communities and actually reaching currently impacted residents, urging more direct outreach to people living in affected neighborhoods.
Guenther summarized other edits: moving content about property rights and moratoria into the land use chapter, relocating housing density text to the new housing chapter, and updating interjurisdictional partnership language. He presented a timeline showing work beginning in June 2023, a Planning Commission public hearing in October 2024, and subsequent commission deliberations and review by the Youth Council and Social Justice and Equity Commission.
The council provided multiple drafting suggestions and asked staff to return with revisions. No formal action was taken at the study session.
