Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Religious Freedom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill clarifying Religious Freedom Act protections for organizations; heated debate on scope
Summary
House Bill 16 15, sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Gary Stubblefield and presented by Rep. Robin Lundstrum, would clarify application of the state's Religious Freedom Act to religious organizations and their hiring; senators debated whether the bill favors specific beliefs and whether it risks establishment-clause or equal-protection problems.
Get email alerts on the Religious Freedom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance House Bill 16 15, legislation that clarifies how Arkansas’s Religious Freedom Act applies to religious organizations and their employment decisions.
Representative Robin Lundstrum (House District 18) presented the bill, saying it ‘‘refines’’ the state’s Religious Freedom Act to allow religious organizations to make employment decisions consistent with their faith. Using the example of a religious youth camp, Lundstrum said a Baptist organization should be able to hire staff who share its religious beliefs. ‘‘This law simply clarifies Arkansas religious freedom act,’’ she told the committee.
The bill prompted sustained debate among senators about whether the draft creates a preference for particular faith-based positions or improperly authorizes religiously based discrimination. Senator Tucker asked whether the bill inserts ‘‘a belief based on religious or philosophical premises’’ into code and whether that meant the statute would codify a specific religious viewpoint. Senator Tucker said, ‘‘There’s a difference between saying because of my religious belief, the government cannot discriminate against me … and saying my religious belief authorizes me to discriminate against other people.’’ He said he would vote against the bill over constitutional concerns.
Supporters said the bill merely restates existing protections and protects all faiths equally. Senator Johnson said the measure ‘‘spells out the rights within the amendment’’ and defended its compatibility with the First Amendment; the sponsor and backers argued it clarifies and protects religious organizations’ freedom to operate according to their sincere beliefs.
The committee approved the bill by voice vote. The transcript shows the chair announced ‘‘Motion carried. Congratulations, Representative Lundstrom; you have passed your bill.’’ Several senators said they will press the issue on the Senate floor, and critics signaled likely floor debate about establishment-clause and equal-protection implications.
