Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lawmakers weigh uniform capacity tax for solar, storage and other renewables; developers and towns clash over retroactivity and rates
Summary
Solar and storage developers, municipal officials and renewable-energy companies told the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee they need clearer, nonretroactive language and protections for tax-stabilization agreements before a uniform capacity tax is enacted.
Developers, municipal officials and energy companies told the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee that a proposal to establish a uniform capacity tax for renewable projects raises unresolved questions about retroactivity, local revenue impacts and differences among technologies.
Jobie (Joby) Moss, director of business development at Verigee, told the committee Verigee "opposes unless amended House Bill 7,266" and asked the legislature to exclude projects that have already reached commercial operation or completed financing from the tax’s reach. Moss said retroactive application would increase expenses for projects that completed financing and might trigger defaults or foreclosures; he recommended protecting existing tax-stabilization agreements and pilot agreements negotiated with host municipalities.
Will Herschel, chief executive officer of Verigee, reiterated the company’s concerns and said he supported the Office of Policy and Management’s (OPM) written testimony. Jeff Hinske, vice…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

