Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government Pay topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill would set Jefferson County tax assessor, collector base pay at 10% above top merit-system employee

3039493 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A local bill introduced in the hearing would set the base annual salary for Jefferson County's tax assessor and tax collector at 10% above the highest-paid merit-system employee in each office, effective Oct. 1, 2027, supporters said.

Supporters described a local bill that would set the base annual salary of Jefferson County's tax assessor and tax collector at 10% above the highest annual salary of any merit-system employee in the respective office, with the change to begin Oct. 1, 2027.

A speaker summarized the proposal: rather than tying the elected officials' pay to a fixed dollar figure, the bill would establish a percentage (10%) above the highest-paid merit-system employee in the tax assessor's or tax collector's office so the elected official would "always have make 10% more than the highest pay[ed] employee in their respective office," according to the transcript. Supporters said the proposal came to the legislator from the county and that Representative Faulkner had worked on the matter.

A committee member asked how the 10% figure was chosen; a speaker identified in the record as Neil Morrison said the 10% was proposed to ensure the elected official's pay remained above the highest-paid merit employee rather than using a fixed dollar amount tied to the county personnel board or merit system.

The transcript records that the base salary "may not decrease after October first of 2027"; the exact statutory text or bill number was not included in the provided record. The matter was placed among local bills in the session; the transcript does not show a final vote or adoption in this excerpt.

Supporters framed the change as a structural adjustment to preserve relative pay levels between elected officials and career staff; the transcript contains questions from committee members about the mechanics and origin of the percentage.