Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners call for clearer process on Title 25 mental-health cases, ask Dept. of Health representative to brief county
Summary
After recent local cases and transfer questions, commissioners sought clarity on how Title 25 involuntary commitment and out-of-county transfers are handled and asked staff to invite a Department of Health representative and the county attorney for an explanatory briefing.
Commissioners discussed recurring complications with Title 25 involuntary-commitment cases and out-of-county transfers, describing surprise costs and inconsistent handling across jurisdictions.
Members asked for a clearer flowchart or protocol so county staff and commissioners can determine when the county is responsible for various steps, where transfers are routed, and who holds legal responsibility when cases cross county lines. One commissioner said the volume of Title 25 matters has increased, making the county’s responsibilities more burdensome.
On the record, a commissioner recommended inviting a representative from the Department of Health and the county attorney to a future meeting to explain statutory responsibilities and how Title 25 is being implemented in practice. The board supported the recommendation and directed staff to arrange the briefing.
No new policy was adopted at the meeting; the action taken was to request expert briefings and additional documentation to reduce surprises in cost and process.
