Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning commission recommends denying rezone request to restore light‑industrial zoning on Elm Avenue amid community opposition

3032811 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Fresno City Planning Commission on Thursday recommended denial of a plan amendment and rezone request (P.2303006) that would change roughly 55.31 acres south of Annadel Avenue from neighborhood mixed use to light industrial.

The Fresno City Planning Commission on Thursday recommended denial of a plan amendment and rezone request (P.2303006) that would change roughly 55.31 acres south of Annadel Avenue and east of State Route 41 from neighborhood mixed use to light industrial.

The commission's vote asks the City Council to reject the applicants' request to revert the Elm Avenue properties to light industrial zoning; the item is scheduled for a council hearing the week following the commission meeting. The item drew more than an hour of public comment, with business and economic‑development representatives urging approval and neighborhood residents and community organizations urging denial.

Staff told the commission the subject area covers 55.31 acres and that, under current zoning, the land carries a theoretical capacity of 64 dwelling units per acre. "At 64 dwellings per acre you have a net residential capacity loss of 3,541 units," Planning and Development supervising planner Rob Holt said while outlining constraints imposed by California law (SB 330 and related statutes) on plan amendments that reduce residential capacity.

Holt said the proposed action would amend Policy LU 8.1 of the Southwest Fresno Specific Plan, rezone the parcels from neighborhood mixed use to a light industrial (I‑L) zone with a set of conditions of zoning, and that any approval would be "subject to compliance with SB 330." He reviewed proposed conditions that staff and the applicant included in the application packet: a requirement that many industrial uses be subject to a conditional use permit; explicit prohibitions on a long list of uses (including recycling processing,…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans