Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Historic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and trustees clash over zoning draft and historic‑district approach; trustees call for more direct review
Summary
Public commenters and trustees debated the draft zoning map and the future of the village historic district. Residents asked for extended comment periods and clearer public process; trustees and the mayor disputed characterizations of committee activity and said the draft remains under revision.
A heated discussion about the village zoning rewrite and the status of the Ballston Spa historic district dominated public comment and board response at the April 14 meeting of the Board of Trustees.
Public commenters said the draft zoning map has been changed multiple times during the comment period and asked the trustees to extend the zone‑map public comment deadline. Marilyn Stevenson, who said the public rezoning workshop on April 3 drew standing‑room attendance, asked the board to extend the zoning comment period from its then‑current April 25 deadline to May 9 to allow more time for review and local input.
Several speakers criticized the use of social media to announce map changes and urged clearer, documented decisionmaking. Gary Stevenson urged that legal and advisory documents referenced during prior hearings be appended to meeting minutes to improve transparency.
Board members and the mayor responded at length. Mayor Frank Rossi disputed characterizations that the historic district had been removed from the draft; he said the existing historic‑district provisions remain intended to be carried forward as "status quo" and that the draft map had been adjusted merely to make an on‑map hatch for the historic overlay more visible. Rossi also said the village is working with the state Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation and that the model preservation code is not a one‑size‑fits‑all solution.
Trustees and residents also sparred over the status and functioning of the Zoning Advisory Committee (ZAC). Residents and some trustees said several ZAC members had stopped attending and asked that a trustee who originally nominated a now‑vacant seat name a replacement. Trustee Bernadette Fundanza and other board members disagreed about whether the village code requires a specific deadline for naming replacements; the village attorney noted that the relevant code subsections do not state a time limit for appointing a replacement.
Trustees said they expect the ZAC to collect and organize public comments and deliver a revised draft; several trustees urged the advisory committee and interested residents to "roll up your sleeves" and submit concrete edit proposals. Several participants urged calmer, more transparent communication and more direct outreach and documentation of the decision process.
No formal board action was taken to change the public comment deadline or to disband advisory committees during the meeting.
Next steps: The board indicated staff will post public comments in an organized form when staff returns; the ZAC is expected to continue to compile comments and work with the consultant on revisions to the draft code. Several residents asked trustees to extend the zoning comment deadline; no extension was adopted at the April 14 meeting.
