Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reinstates graffiti fines in ordinance amid debate on business impacts

3006386 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on March 22 to reinstate enforcement and fines under the city's graffiti abatement ordinance, a measure sponsors said is needed after a rise in graffiti removal issues following pandemic suspensions.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passed, on first reading March 22, an ordinance reinstating parts of the Graffiti Removal and Abatement Ordinance that had been suspended during the pandemic and authorizing the issuance of certain violations and the collection of associated fees.

Sponsor and supporters said the pandemic suspension had helped struggling small businesses but had produced unintended consequences, and they argued that enforcement must resume. Supervisor Safai asked to be added as a co-sponsor and said that graffiti had become ‘‘out of control’’ in some neighborhoods and that property owners who do not remove graffiti need to be held accountable. Supervisor Peskin noted the law assigns responsibility to property owners, not typically small business tenants, and said the city will examine whether lease arrangements that pass responsibility to tenants can be limited by law.

Peskin also reported that prior to the pandemic only about 3% of cases culminated in fines, meaning most problems were abated after notice. Supporters including Supervisors Ronan, Melgar and Mandelmann said they supported reinstatement while acknowledging a need to avoid harming small businesses and to work on new remedies.

Board action: The ordinance was taken on first reading and passed unanimously on March 22, 2022. Supervisors said they would continue work with public works to implement notices and processes and requested follow-up on protections for small businesses and private-property owners.

Ending: Supporters said reinstatement is a temporary step while legislative or administrative fixes are developed to support small business and reduce unintended impacts on tenants.