Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board overturns Planning Commission, disapproves conditional-use authorization for 2785 San Bruno Ave.

3006149 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public testimony and conflicting evidence about an accessory unit, the Board of Supervisors disapproved the Planning Commission's approval to demolish structures at 2785 San Bruno Avenue and denied the project’s conditional-use authorization by an 11-0 roll-call vote.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Sept. 20 voted to disapprove a Planning Commission conditional-use authorization that had allowed demolition of a single-family dwelling with an alleged accessory unit at 2785 San Bruno Avenue and construction of a new four-story mixed-use building.

Supervisor David Campos, who moved to disapprove the conditional use authorization, told the board he believed the record supported retaining existing tenant housing and that questions about whether rent-control protections applied had not been resolved. "I believe that there is enough evidence in the record here that actually confirms what the planning commission said, which is there's a second unit here," Campos said at the hearing, then moved to disapprove the conditional-use authorization. The motion to disapprove and to prepare related findings was adopted on a roll-call vote of 11-0.

The appeal centered on whether an unauthorized accessory unit existed in the rear structure and, if so, whether removal would eliminate rent-protected housing. Appellants' counsel Steven Williams argued the rear space had functioned as a separate unit for years and presented photographs, a former tenant's letter and other materials that he said showed a full kitchen had existed and that the space had independent access and sleeping quarters. "If you allow these flimsy excuses to sway your decision, then you're supporting an exception which will completely swallow the policy," Williams told the board.

Planning Department staff and the Planning Commission had treated the rear structure as an unauthorized unit…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans