Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Tesla, GoodLeap and contractors urge PURA to retain passive-dispatch option or preserve a larger upfront incentive
Summary
Major market participants warned PURA that eliminating the passive-dispatch/upfront-incentive option could slow residential and third-party-owner participation, and asked for optionality or a phased transition tied to final successor tariff and ITC timing.
Tesla, third-party owners and contractor representatives told PURA they opposed a wholesale removal of the ESS passive-dispatch track or a sharp reduction in the upfront enrollment incentive without more time for the market to respond to recent program changes.
Why it matters: Removing or sharply reducing a known upfront incentive risks slowing adoption, stakeholders said, particularly as federal homeowner ITC eligibility and supply-chain rules are in flux. Several participants urged optionality rather than a single-path program design.
Tesla said it supports the program but urged regulators to preserve optionality for customers: both the enrollment/upfront incentive tied to a passive (daily) dispatch track and the proposed pay-for-performance structure can…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
