Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Systems Technical Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances voting-system identifier changes; Unicode amendment fails
Summary
Senate Bill 526, which adjusts technical identifier-marker language for voting systems, passed committee 9-4 after the committee adopted a vendor-friendly amendment; an amendment to require ASCII/Unicode compliance was rejected.
Get email alerts on the Voting Systems Technical Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Elections and Apportionment Committee advanced Senate Bill 526 by a 9-4 vote after adopting amendment 2, which relaxed a mandatory requirement to a permissive one to accommodate vendor concerns. A separate amendment that would have required voting systems to support ASCII or Unicode character sets to display accent marks and other diacritics failed 4-9.
The bill’s sponsor explained that amendment 2 changes a "must" to a "may" on one provision and removes a specific data-field requirement; the sponsor said the change was proposed to accommodate concerns raised by an election vendor and that the committee might revisit the provision in the future.
Representative Boye offered an amendment to require that a VSToP (voting system testing program) determination of compliance include support for ASCII text or Unicode standards so candidate names with accent marks or other diacritics display correctly on ballots. Boye said that without ASCII or Unicode support, ballots may not render characters such as cedillas, tildes, or umlauts. Committee members questioned whether the change was necessary now; Boye said the co-directors had met with VSToP and that the vendors asked for the standard to be included.
The committee recorded roll-call votes on the amendments and the final bill. The Unicode/ASCII amendment failed on a roll-call vote; the bill with the vendor-accommodation amendment passed 9-4. The committee chair closed the meeting, stating Senate Bill 526 passes committee 9-4.
The transcript shows committee members raised compatibility concerns with vendors and displayed some skepticism about adding specific character-set mandates into statute. The final language accepted by the committee reflects a compromise to leave some technical specifications flexible for vendors and the testing program.
