Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Long Range Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Waukesha committee launches 'Optimizing Our Future' process to right‑size district footprint
Summary
The committee approved a three-phase public engagement and planning process to reduce building capacity by 10–15% over time, focusing first on K–8 facilities; public information sessions and staff meetings are scheduled in April and May, and any facility changes would begin no earlier than the 2026–27 school year.
The Waukesha School District Finance and Facilities Committee on April 7 reviewed and endorsed a three-phase planning process — branded "Optimizing Our Future" — to develop a long-range recommendation for reducing the district's building capacity by about 10–15% to reflect ongoing declines in enrollment.
Administrators told the committee the district's enrollment has fallen from a peak just over 13,000 students in 2012–13 to roughly 10,500 students today and is projected to decline through 2034. Staff proposed focusing the initial planning work on the K–8 footprint and said the goal is to align building capacity with enrollment while maintaining educational quality.
The proposed three phases use calendar year 2025: phase 1 (information sharing) in April–May with staff and community sessions; phase 2 (gathering input) May–October with development of final plan proposals and internal/external feedback; and phase 3 (presenting a recommendation) in October–December for a board decision. Administrators said any facility changes would be timed to begin with the 2026–27 school year.
Staff listed specific upcoming information sessions: staff meetings April 14 at Butler, April 15 at West and April 16 at Horning (with separate secondary and elementary session times), and evening community sessions April 22 at West (6 p.m.), May 1 at Butler (6 p.m.) and May 7 at Horning (6 p.m.). Staff said the sessions will be posted on the district’s Optimizing Our Future webpage and that the technology department plans to record sessions for later viewing; staff said they prefer recordings rather than live streaming to avoid discouraging in-person attendance.
Administrators told the committee the district expects to be debt-free in 2026 after repaying a 2018 referendum and indicated the administration’s preference to right-size the footprint without a referendum; they said other districts have pursued a variety of approaches, including some that pair building changes with referendums.
Board members asked about implementation details, capacity assumptions and the impact on staffing. Staff said capacity calculations were based on an inventory of instructional spaces and utilization assumptions (for secondary schools, a utilization rate was applied; for elementary schools, class-size assumptions were used) and that the 10–15% target still leaves capacity to absorb future enrollment increases. Staff emphasized the district expects to rely on retirements and natural attrition to reconcile staffing with enrollment rather than immediate large-scale layoffs.
Administrators said they will return to this committee in May with a report on how the information sessions went and with a more detailed description of phase 2.
