Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors call for clearer agendas and more committee discussion during Chippewa County Board meeting
Summary
Multiple supervisors raised concerns about how agenda items are brought forward and about committee communication and responsiveness from department heads. One supervisor asked for more open dialogue and clearer processes for adding items to future agendas.
Several supervisors used the meeting’s agenda‑items discussion and the agendas-for-future-consideration period to raise concerns about how items are presented to the county board and how committee work is coordinated.
A supervisor identified in the meeting as a long‑time board member criticized the current agenda process and said it limits full board discussion: “I feel like…we're being force fed, like, agenda items that maybe don't always have our vision for the public sector…we're being led around this place to say yes all the time,” the supervisor said, asking for more open dialogue and the ability for the full board’s 21 members to discuss issues in depth.
During the same exchange, other supervisors asked for clarification about how to place items on future agendas. The chair and other members explained that agenda placement follows the board’s ordinance and Robert’s Rules of Order; one supervisor was directed to work with the executive committee if they wished to see an item discussed there. The chair said a motion to place an item on a future agenda can be made and voted on, but that the public meeting notice requirements limit taking actions on items not noticed to the public in advance.
A related procedural point arose when a supervisor said a motion to have the county board pay extra halftime costs approved by the sheriff for festival events had been submitted previously but was not placed on the public agenda. County leadership said the request could be brought to the executive committee for consideration and asked the supervisor to resubmit the item for scheduling.
Multiple supervisors also raised concerns about communication from department heads — including unanswered emails and calls — and asked for improved responsiveness to supervisors and residents. One supervisor asked whether a guide or orientation existed for new supervisors; the chair noted that board ordinances and Robert’s Rules of Order govern procedure and that a handbook had been provided to supervisors at an earlier meeting.
The meeting adjourned after the exchange and a motion to adjourn was carried.
