Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Meetings Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenters tell River Heights commission to distinguish public meetings from public hearings
Summary
A training session at the April 8 meeting advised planning commissioners on the legal and practical differences between public meetings and public hearings, recommended procedures for public comment, time limits and chair responsibilities, and cautioned about legal risks of taking unscheduled public comment on land-use applications.
River Heights commissioners received training during the April 8 session on how public meetings and public hearings differ and on practical approaches to managing public comment.
Presenters and guidance: Will (planning consultant) and Todd (attorney) led the presentation. Will emphasized that planning commissions are public bodies subject to Utah's open meetings laws and that public hearings (not routine meetings) provide participants the statutory right to speak on specific matters. He advised the commission to adopt written rules in advance for large hearings (for example, sign-up sheets, speaker order and time limits) and to use visible timers when appropriate.
Legal cautions: Todd, an attorney, warned that permitting the public to comment on an administrative application outside a noticed public hearing can create legal risk. He recommended the presumptive rule of limiting public comment on applications to properly noticed hearings; he said taking unscheduled public comment on land-use applications can leave a city open to a claim that the process prejudiced the applicant.
Practical procedure recommended: Presenters suggested a typical order for contested items: staff presentation; planning-commission questions of staff; applicant presentation; public hearing; applicant right of rebuttal; commission deliberation and decision. Both presenters said chairs control whether to allow public comment in a meeting that is not a hearing and urged even-handed treatment if comment is allowed.
Next steps: Commissioners discussed whether to adopt or post rules about speaker time limits and public-comment procedures. Staff referenced available training materials (including HB 365 guidance) and a planning commission folder with resources on the city's SharePoint site.
