Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Survey shows strong local interest in indoor recreation; council agrees to continue South End planning
Summary
Consultants and Nibley City presented results of a broad indoor recreation survey showing high interest from Wellsville residents in courts, fitness and aquatics. Council voted to remain engaged with a South End feasibility process and to receive more legal and funding details before any binding decision.
Consultants from VCBO and Nibley City reported to the Wellsville City Council on April 2 that a broadly distributed indoor recreation survey drew more than 4,700 responses overall, including 408 responses from people who identified themselves as Wellsville residents. The Wellsville respondents reported high intended use of a potential facility and substantial, though not unanimous, willingness to support public funding.
The survey results, presented by Whitney Ward of VCBO and Chad Wright (recreation director for Nibley City), show indoor court sports, open-access cardio/strength areas and an indoor walking/jogging track as top priorities. Aquatics—including lap swimming and learn-to-swim programming—also scored highly: about 304 of the 408 Wellsville respondents indicated they want aquatics options. Ward said the median monthly amount survey takers were willing to pay was about $15 per household ($180 per year). Ward cautioned that the community preference survey is not a statistically valid ballot survey and recommended a follow-up statistically valid survey before any bond or ballot measure.
Nut graf: The council voted to remain in the South End coordination process so Wellsville can keep receiving analysis and legal briefings about options including a city-only facility, multiple-city special service district, or countywide approaches. The motion commits the city only to continued study, not to any financing or tax increase.
Officials emphasized both the promise and limits of the current data. Ward said the survey collected community preferences and open comments over a six-week period and will inform concept development and a later statistically valid vote if the project advances. Wright said the South End study team expects to develop concept options, then use a statistically valid survey to test funding appetite and finalize bond language if the group decides to pursue a ballot measure.
Council discussion and vote: Councilmember Carl moved—and the council approved—a motion indicating Wellsville will continue participating in the South End planning and study process to gather further information. Ward and Wright told the council that cooperation among multiple South End cities could allow a larger, more resilient facility and potential cost savings, while a single-city approach would be faster but likely smaller and more limited in scope.
Public comments at the meeting reflected a mix of perspectives: Tracy Bodrero read the survey questions aloud and expressed concern about details and disclosure (including whether multiple submissions per person were possible), while Stephanie Nesson spoke in support of developing an indoor recreation center, citing benefits for families and seniors. Council members asked about response distribution (VCBO said the survey asked respondents where they live and provided a Wellsville-specific extract of 408 responses) and expressed desire for more demographic breakdowns—specifically ownership vs. renting—which Ward said would be part of a later statistically valid survey.
Next steps and finances: Ward said a majority of survey respondents leaned toward supporting a tax increase for a facility (about 70 percent combined “definitely/probably yes” on the question in the sample), but she reiterated that the sample is a preference survey not a ballot poll. The consulting team will develop conceptual options and recommended an eventual statistically valid voter survey that ties program details to estimated household tax impacts. Councilmembers asked for follow-up on governance options (special service district vs. city-only), legal implications, and the geographic boundaries for a taxing district if one is proposed.
Ending: Councilmembers asked VCBO and Nibley City to keep Wellsville staff and council informed; the council voted in favor of remaining part of the study process. Any formal ballot measure or tax increase would require further analysis, a separate council decision, and a public vote.
