Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews multi-million-dollar water and irrigation projects and considers impact-fee updates
Summary
At the budget retreat councilors reviewed ongoing irrigation and water projects—two large settling ponds, a 2 million-gallon tank, multiple well projects—and discussed reviewing impact fees for secondary water and future irrigation expansion funding, with NRCS identified as a major funder for irrigation phases.
Hurricane City officials used the April 8 budget retreat to outline a set of ongoing and planned water and irrigation projects, cautioning that some multi-year undertakings still require additional funding and may prompt changes to impact-fee policies.
Staff described recent work on two large settling ponds—each configured as multi-million-gallon concrete structures for the city’s secondary/irrigation system—and a 2,000,000-gallon water tank that has gone to bid near the Sky Ranch area. City staff said three wells are drilled or planned to supply culinary and irrigation water: Dixie Springs (culinary), Sky Ranch (good-quality culinary), and three falls/wells planned for irrigation service. The irrigation expansion discussed includes multi-phase work; city staff said two phases are currently funded through the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the NRCS historically covered about 75% of some phases of irrigation expansion.
Council members and staff discussed how long large infrastructure projects take—from initial concept through engineering and funding—and emphasized the importance of planning so new growth does not shift long-term costs to future ratepayers. Staff noted they have purchased properties to support irrigation infrastructure and referenced a parcel bought from a party identified in discussion as Bruder Hall near JR’s Place.
Several council members urged a closer look at impact fees tied to secondary water and other utilities. Staff recommended the council consider updating impact-fee charges to reflect the cost of purchasing and delivering secondary water in Elam Valley and other expansion areas. A council member also reported meeting the local representative for U.S. Sen. John Curtis to discuss federal funding and noted broader federal holdbacks affecting NRCS timelines.
Why it matters: The projects are large, multi-year capital investments that directly affect water supply, irrigation capacity and where growth can be served without burdening existing ratepayers. Impact-fee policy decisions will shape who pays for future system extensions.
What’s next: Staff will return with more detailed cost and impact-fee analyses; councilors asked to compile specific questions for a planned discussion with an outside consultant on power and impact-fee modeling and to prepare for the work meeting on water district efficiency standards.
