Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission to study subdivision and permit fees, revise ordinance language on utility stubs and permit durations
Summary
Commissioners agreed to map application steps, estimate staff time, and update permit and subdivision language (including requiring service stubs to property and clarifying permit validity) before a public hearing.
The Fountain Green Planning and Zoning Commission on April 10 directed staff to prepare a cost-recovery study for subdivision and permit fees, clarify ordinance language around utilities ("stub" vs. "hookup") and set timelines for permit validity and project commencement.
Commissioners and staff discussed moving from arbitrary or legacy fees to a more defensible schedule that ties each application step to approximate staff time and an hourly rate. Heather (staff) and other commissioners described a proposed approach: list each processing step, estimate time per step, multiply by average staff wage and use the result to justify a standardized fee schedule. The commission agreed to ask the city to collect step-level time estimates from staff and to prepare a first-draft fee schedule for review.
The commission also reviewed draft changes to conditional-use language and building-permit rules. Staff recommended replacing ambiguous terms such as "hookup" with "stub" for service laterals (a capped service pipe extended to the property line but not put into service) and adding a diagram to the ordinance to clarify where meters, meter cans and stubs are expected to be located relative to property lines. Commissioners asked Public Works (Kurt) to produce a cross-section diagram showing the meter can on the city side and a stub extending several feet onto the private property.
On permit validity, commissioners debated a start-date requirement. Fairview and other Utah municipalities were cited as examples: an initial permit-validity window of 180 days (about six months) to start work and possible one-time extensions was discussed. Commissioners favored requiring applicants to start construction within a limited time frame so permits do not remain open indefinitely; they also recognized legitimate exceptions for weather or financing delays. The commission asked staff to draft language for a public hearing that would implement a reasonable start period and a requirement that utilities be stubbed to the property or meter-cans be set before certain approvals are final.
The commission scheduled work sessions for next month to review the draft application forms and ordinance language (chapters identified during the meeting included subdivision and design standards chapters). Staff will obtain step-by-step time estimates from city employees, and the commission will try to complete a first draft of the fee schedule and revised application forms for public review.
