Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents ask council to extend Ragged Point Road no‑use signs; traffic committee refers matter to full council
Summary
Residents of a Ragged Point Road neighborhood asked the Dorchester County Council to extend a dusk‑to‑dawn restriction to all hours on a causeway to address littering, safety and nuisance uses; the traffic safety committee made no safety recommendation and the council requested residents submit documentation for further review.
Residents from the Ragged Point Road area urged the Dorchester County Council on April 1 to expand a posted restriction that currently prohibits use from dusk to dawn to a full-time ban. The request follows complaints about litter, nuisance uses and safety concerns on a causeway used for fishing and vehicle access.
Councilman Tetner reported the item from the county’s Traffic Safety Committee as a referral rather than a committee recommendation, saying the committee did not view it strictly as a traffic-safety matter and recommended the full council discuss whether to restrict public use of the county-owned causeway. He summarized the residents’ rationale as concerns about litter and neighborhood impacts.
Resident Tracy Orlando told the council she and her neighbors submitted a letter of concern and asked the council for a commitment to discuss the issue further. Orlando said the requested change would extend an earlier action taken by the committee in 2022 and that the group can provide additional documentation about incidents and safety concerns. Council staff asked residents to send supporting information and contact details to an office email the clerk provided so staff could distribute the material to council members and review it formally.
Council members noted that some aspects of the request touch on personal and public safety and encouraged residents to report incidents to law enforcement, including the county nonemergency number. No formal change to the sign restrictions or county code was adopted at the meeting; the council left the matter for further consideration after receiving documentation from residents.
The council did not take a vote to change the signage during the April 1 meeting.
