Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Broadband Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners raise concerns about Senate Bill 818 that would make counties pay some broadband relocation costs

3220685 · April 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Matt Bridal, Marion County legislative manager, told the board on April 1 that Senate Bill 818 would make local governments responsible for relocating certain broadband, cable and video provider facilities in public rights-of-way when those facilities conflict with road projects.

Matt Bridal, Marion County legislative manager, briefed the board on legislative language and timing for Senate Bill 818 and an identical House companion (HB703). Bridal said the identical House bill had passed its first committee stop unanimously; the Senate bill had passed its initial committee and was scheduled in Senate Transportation the same afternoon.

"Senate bill 818, utility relocation currently... is being heard in senate transportation today at 4PM," Bridal said. He explained that the bill inserts a new provision that in "certain instances," including broadband, video or cable providers, the local government would become responsible for the cost of relocating those facilities when a road project requires relocation.

Commissioners and staff discussed practical impacts. Commissioner Stone and others asked whether the county would be obligated to buy additional right-of-way or merely relocate facilities within existing right-of-way; staff clarified the bill's text would require local governments to pay for relocation within the right-of-way. Commissioner Zalick and others warned the change could shift large, unforeseen costs onto local road projects and asked staff to prepare an analysis. County administration and staff agreed to prepare further information and a draft letter for consideration.

Ending: Commissioners asked for a detailed fiscal analysis and said they would discuss a draft letter of concern; staff recommended gathering more data before taking a formal position.