Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facility Renovations Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff recommend cooperative-purchase contracts for Indian Crest, Salford Hills renovation work; final prices to go to board
Summary
SiteLogic and district staff previewed cooperative purchasing awards for interior finishes and equipment at Salford Hills and Indian Crest; several contracts were recommended and a few estimated prices are pending finalization for board action later this month.
District facilities staff and SiteLogic presented details on cooperative purchasing agreements for renovation work at Salford Hills and Indian Crest, recommending several contractors and asking the board to consider final awards at the upcoming board action meeting.
Damian Spar of SiteLogic said the cooperative-purchasing approach allowed the district to confirm scopes of work with qualified contractors before final contract signature, reducing the risk of change orders and enabling negotiations on scope and price. He presented recommended awards and estimated prices for several packages.
On Salford Hills, SiteLogic recommended Suburban Enterprises for ceramic tile work at a recommended award of $233,500; CR Blinds was recommended for blinds and window treatments at about $60,000. Toilet-partition pricing was still being finalized and was estimated in the $50,000 range, Spar said. For Indian Crest, SiteLogic reported wood-flooring pricing was being finalized within estimate, residential appliances for family and consumer sciences were listed as “furnish only” (district installation to be coordinated separately), and toilet partitions pricing remained to be finalized. A flagpole was shown as a $10,000 furnish/install estimate but presenters said that number may change.
Board members asked for more detail on the appliance package and requested a breakdown of appliance counts and pricing; Mr. Spar and Mr. Taylor said they would provide a line-item breakdown with the final contract documents. The presenters told the committee they expected recommended awards to come in “around budget” and asked the board to consider the final awards at the upcoming board action meeting.
No formal bid awards were approved at the committee meeting; SiteLogic and district staff said they would finalize remaining numbers in the next few days and submit final contracts to the board for approval.
