Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget Taxation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ivins council debates FY2026 budget as managers warn of $1.3M shortfall

3051958 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a proposed FY2026 budget that adds staff and capital spending but leaves a projected operating shortfall of about $1.3 million; council discussed options including modest property-tax increases, use of one-time revenue, starting a road-replacement fund and packaging future service-fee changes.

Ivins City staff outlined a proposed fiscal year 2026 budget Thursday that would add several personnel and capital items while leaving an estimated operating gap of roughly $1.3 million.

Cade, the city finance presenter, told the council that while operating revenues are largely consistent with expectations, several factors are reducing one-time nonoperating revenues the city has used in recent years — chiefly a projected decline in interest earnings and slower-than-expected tourist-related receipts connected to a partially opened resort. Those changes, combined with proposed staffing and equipment requests, create the shortfall in the city’s draft plan.

Major items in the proposed FY2026 budget include: a request to fund six new full-time positions across departments (police, parks, cemetery and animal shelter among them); a proposed $4-per-hour increase for sworn police officers; funding for roughly nine replacement and new vehicles; an upgraded Axon body-camera / taser contract for police; a proposed city planner in the building/permit group; and capital projects including the animal shelter remodel and continued Highway 91 work. Staff also proposed creating a new dedicated “wrap tax” fund (three-way split for parks, recreation and arts), and a separate road-replacement reserve to begin growing a long-term streets fund.

Staff framed the budget choice as a combination of two pressures: rising necessary operating costs (wage and service increases, catch-up on deferred vehicle replacement and parks maintenance) and declining nonrecurring revenues (smaller interest earnings under new state handling of developer warranty bonds and slower-than-forecast resort-related receipts). The draft assumes a CPI-based pay adjustment (2.9 percent) and a separate merit pool (up to 2.1 percent) for non-sworn employees.

Council discussion focused on options to close the gap: reduce services and cancel proposed hires, increase the property-tax levy through the “truth-in-taxation” process, seek new targeted taxes (state-level proposals for an EMS sales-tax option were discussed), or start new service/impact fees including a proposed road- or street-maintenance fee. Several council members favored smaller, incremental property-tax increases rather than a single large jump; others urged caution to avoid burdening residents on fixed incomes.

Finance staff provided numerical context: the draft budget conservatively assumes modest growth in property and sales tax revenue; it shows a drop in interest income of roughly $400,000–$500,000 year-over-year due to changes in how city-held warranty bonds are handled. Staff also described a planned $305,000 transfer to seed the new wrap-tax fund from unspent prior-year wrap-tax revenue.

No final votes on tax rates or the budget were taken Thursday; the council directed staff to provide more detailed line-item comparisons, a three-year forecast and a numeric estimate of revenue from the proposed EMS sales-tax option should it become available. Staff said tentative adoption and a public hearing could happen in May with final action before the end of the fiscal year.