Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Windows Solar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables decision on front windows and solar permit at 4426 Oxford Drive
Summary
The commission deferred a decision on replacement windows and an associated solar permit for 4426 Oxford Drive, asking the homeowner to consider replacing six front windows to operative, divided‑light standards and to consult with Preservation Office before returning.
The City of El Paso Historic Landmark Commission tabled consideration of a certificate of appropriateness for window replacements at 4426 Oxford Drive and said it is holding the homeowner’s solar permit application until the window issue is resolved.
Preservation Office staff flagged multiple recently installed windows that do not match historic divided‑light profiles on the house in the Austin Terrace Historic District and recommended replacing the six windows on the principal façade with operable sash that include three‑dimensional applied muntins to simulate the original appearance. ‘‘We are holding [the solar permit] up until this decision is made,’’ Preservation Office staff member Provia said when introducing the item.
A representative for the homeowner said some of the new windows were installed by a previous contractor and were expensive, operable units installed about three years ago. The representative also said the contractor on site is pursuing permits for roof, AC and solar work; staff told the applicant the roofing and AC permits could proceed but indicated they typically would not permit solar installations visible from the public right‑of‑way until windows are brought into compliance.
Commissioners suggested the owner meet with Preservation Office staff; the homeowner’s representative indicated she would convey the commission’s request. The commission voted to table the item until the next meeting so the owner and contractor can consult with staff and either return or satisfy the condition administratively. The motion to table was made by the presiding commissioner and seconded; the item was tabled by voice vote.
