Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legislation Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

New Hampshire Senate advances student-transport rule, tables cannabis bills and approves veterans tax credit

3039491 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The New Hampshire Senate on Monday voted to advance a bill requiring parental consent before school staff transport students to nonemergency medical or mental-health appointments, tabled two cannabis bills after extended debate and approved a $5,000 property tax credit option for permanently and totally disabled veterans.

The New Hampshire Senate voted 21–3 to advance House Bill 231, a proposal that would prohibit school personnel from transporting students to medical or mental-health appointments without parental knowledge or consent except in emergencies or when following a published school-district policy. The chamber also laid two cannabis bills on the table after separate roll-call votes — House Bill 53, which would have allowed qualifying patients and caregivers to cultivate limited amounts of cannabis for therapeutic use, and House Bill 75, a proposal to legalize adult recreational cannabis. Lawmakers approved other measures including an option for towns to grant a $5,000 property tax credit to permanently and totally disabled veterans, and changes to hunting and fishing penalties and licensing requirements.

Senator Joe Abbas, reading the education committee report, moved the motion that House Bill 231 “ought to pass,” saying the bill “aims to create clear boundaries and protections for both students and school staff by ensuring parental involvement in nonemergency medical transportation decisions.” Senator Altschuler spoke in opposition to the committee recommendation, arguing the bill is unnecessary in many districts and could conflict with existing child-abuse and mandatory-reporting processes handled by the Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF). "There is absolutely no opposition to having parental consent — the importance of parental involvement — what we oppose is how this bill goes about it," Altschuler said.

Several senators raised specific concerns during debate about insurance coverage and emergency exceptions. Altschuler warned the bill's narrowly drawn emergency carve-out (ambulance transport) could force school staff into difficult choices when ambulances are delayed, given the state's ongoing ambulance shortage, and could place staff and students at risk. Senator Innes and others described instances brought to their attention in which school personnel had transported students for health care without parental notification; Innes said he had spoken with a school counselor who reported students sometimes were taken for treatment without parental awareness.

A roll call was requested; the clerk recorded 21 ayes and 3 nays, and the bill was ordered to third reading.

On cannabis, the Senate judiciary committee reported both House Bill 53 (therapeutic cultivation) and House Bill 75 (legalization for persons 21 and older) as "inexpedient to legislate." Committee members and floor speakers debated enforcement, possession limits and access. Senator Abbas explained that HB 53 would have allowed qualifying patients to cultivate up to three mature plants, three immature plants and 12 seedlings, and to possess up to 8 ounces of usable cannabis; committee members said those limits and transfer allowances would be difficult to regulate and could ‘‘open the floodgates’’ for unlawful distribution. Senator Altschuler and others urged allowing further debate and amendments; after an initial roll call that tied on HB 53, the Senate later laid HB 53 on the table by a recorded vote of 16–8. House Bill 75 was laid on the table by a 15–9 vote.

The Senate approved House Bill 99, which would allow towns to adopt a $5,000 property tax credit option for qualified service-connected permanently and totally disabled veterans, advancing the bill from committee and ordering it to third reading. Senator Gray said the $5,000 figure was chosen based on an estimate of the state’s average property tax bill (about $4,000 per the Department of Revenue Administration) and explained the change was intended to reach the most vulnerable veterans.

Other committee recommendations adopted or acted on Monday included:

- House Bill 655 (energy/natural resources) — the Senate adopted a committee amendment addressing nonresident commercial saltwater licenses and added a floor amendment to address Atlantic menhaden; the bill was ordered to third reading.

- House Bill 144 (dental hygiene) — the Senate adopted a conforming amendment to require that dental licensees hold a DDS or DMD from a school recognized by the Commission on Dental Accreditation; the bill was ordered to third reading.

- House Bill 478 (foster-care oversight subcommittee) — adopted on the consent calendar and ordered to third reading.

Several other bills were reported "inexpedient to legislate" by the judiciary committee, including measures concerning hemp-derived cannabinoids in the definition of cannabis and permitting patient cultivation in broader forms; motions to table or find ITL were adopted in committee or on the floor.

Votes at a glance

- House Bill 231 (transport of students to nonemergency medical/mental-health appointments): committee recommends ought to pass; floor roll call 21–3; ordered to third reading.

- House Bill 53 (therapeutic cultivation — qualifying patients/designated caregivers): judiciary committee recommended inexpedient to legislate; motion to lay on table adopted 16–8 (after a tie vote was recorded earlier in proceedings); bill laid on table.

- House Bill 75 (legalize cannabis for 21+): judiciary committee recommended inexpedient to legislate; motion to lay on table adopted 15–9; bill laid on table.

- House Bill 162 FN (informed consent for law-enforcement searches of homes/property): judiciary committee recommended inexpedient to legislate; motion adopted (voice vote) — committee recommendation sustained.

- House Bill 99 (property-tax credit for permanently and totally disabled veterans): committee recommends ought to pass; adopted on the floor and ordered to third reading.

- House Bill 655 FN (fishing/game violations and permits): committee recommends ought to pass; floor amendment adopted (addressing Atlantic menhaden reciprocity); ordered to third reading.

- House Bill 144 FN (practice of dental hygiene — local anesthesia training and degree requirements): committee recommends ought to pass; floor amendment requiring DDS/DMD from CODA-accredited school adopted; ordered to third reading.

What lawmakers said and why it matters

Supporters of HB 231 said the bill would safeguard parental rights and set uniform expectations for school districts. Opponents cautioned the change could unintentionally conflict with mandatory-reporting statutes and existing school protocols that involve DCYF and law enforcement, especially in cases of suspected abuse or when ambulance transport is not readily available.

On cannabis, proponents of cultivation authority framed the bills as access and equity measures for chronically ill or low-income patients who face high costs and limited licensure of treatment centers; opponents on the judiciary committee cited enforcement challenges and concerns that possession limits and transfer provisions would be difficult to police and could enable diversion.

Why the Senate action matters

The votes advanced HB 231 to a third reading, meaning the full Senate will consider final passage later. Bills laid on the table (HB 53 and HB 75) are not immediately advancing but could be revived under Senate rules. The tax-credit and licensing changes ordered to third reading will move forward in the legislative process for final consideration.

The Senate also used tabling and "inexpedient to legislate" recommendations to block proposals the judiciary committee found problematic, while advancing measures that committees and the floor described as clarifying or protective of specific populations.

Next steps

Bills ordered to third reading will return to the Senate calendar for a final vote. Measures laid on the table remain subject to procedural motions to remove them from the table at a later floor session.