Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Easement Closure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Works objects to easement closure request at 3311 South Troost; staff deny application

3038129 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff recommended denying a requested sewer-easement closure at 3311 South Troost Avenue because an active, eight-foot-deep sewer line runs through the easement; staff said the easement was granted in 1937 and that closing it would not be appropriate without providing alternate easement for service or property changes.

Public Works staff recommended denial of a request to close a sewer easement at 3311 South Troost Avenue, telling the Public Works Committee that an active sewer main runs through the easement and that multiple city departments and utilities objected.

Staff said the applicant’s form suggested the easement was no longer needed, but that review found an active sewer line — about eight feet deep in the area — and objections from right-of-way, sewer operations and maintenance, wastewater design and water and sewer divisions. Staff noted the easement dates to 1937 and that the sewer has existed in place since then.

The staff presentation said the application is for a closure rather than a license agreement; staff explained that if a property owner sought to build a pool or an addition, the city would provide options such as realigning the sanitary sewer or acquiring easement from a neighbor, but in this case there was no specific redevelopment plan and staff therefore recommended denying the closure request.

Committee members were told the house on the lot is a new build in the curbside area and that staff had informed the applicant of the denial through the administrative process. The board will take the item up again at the next meeting for council action if the applicant pursues an appeal.