Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Rhna topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisor Mar asks to delay RHNA allocation resolution after extensive public comment; item continued to Sept. 1
Summary
Supervisor Mar moved to continue a resolution addressing San Francisco’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for above‑moderate market-rate housing; the item drew prolonged public comment and was continued to Sept. 1.
Supervisor Mar on Aug. 25 moved to continue a resolution urging the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) to keep San Francisco’s above‑moderate RHNA allocation at current levels and to focus more new housing on low- and moderate-income needs. The board agreed to continue the matter to its Sept. 1 meeting.
The resolution (Item 29) and the motion to continue drew a lengthy public-comment period, with callers offering sharply divided views. Supporters of the motion — including speakers representing tenant- and senior-advocacy groups and neighborhood coalitions — told the board the city has disproportionately produced market‑rate, above‑moderate housing and that future allocations should prioritize deeply affordable units. Callers named organizations such as Senior and Disability Action and the San Francisco Land Use Coalition and cited city planning reports that prioritize affordable housing.
Opponents — including residents, doctors, educators and others — argued the city still needs more market-rate housing to reduce pricing pressure, to retain essential workers and to provide housing in safer, less fire-prone parts of the Bay Area. Several callers connected the discussion to recent wildfire smoke and climate risk, saying limiting housing in San Francisco would push people into higher‑risk suburban and exurban areas.
Supervisor Mar asked for the continuance to Sept. 1 so the board and public could have more time to review the complex RHNA allocation issue. The motion to continue passed on a unanimous roll call. The transcript records many individual public statements both supporting and opposing the proposed ABAG guidance, but no final position on RHNA allocations was adopted at the Aug. 25 meeting.
Ending note: The item will return to the board on Sept. 1. The public record on Aug. 25 includes a large number of named callers and advocates; those materials and any updated housing‑production data should be reviewed ahead of the resumed discussion.
