Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ordinance would let tenants seek rent‑board relief for general‑obligation bond pass‑throughs; passes first reading

3006271 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An ordinance advanced Oct. 22 would allow tenants who receive pass‑through charges tied to general‑obligation bond repayments to petition the Rent Board for hardship relief, create a use‑it‑or‑lose‑it limit on banking pass‑throughs, and extend the time tenants have to pay such charges. The measure passed its first reading unanimously.

The Board considered an ordinance (Item 22) forwarded from the Rules Committee that would amend the city’s Administrative Code to allow tenants who received a pass‑through of general‑obligation (GO) bond repayment costs from their landlords to petition the Rent Board for financial‑hardship relief. The ordinance also would limit the number of years a landlord may “bank” pass‑through charges when a new owner assumes control, and extend the time period tenants have to pay such pass‑throughs.

Supervisor Aaron Peskin, who sponsored the legislation, traced the history of the city’s approach to GO bonds and pass‑throughs and said the 2002 framework split certain bond pass‑throughs between tenants and landlords as a political compromise to enable bond passage. Peskin said the city has since worked on retiring issued debt while maintaining property tax stability, but that cumulative pass‑throughs, utility and capital improvement pass‑throughs and annual rent increases can place an “undue burden” on tenants on fixed incomes. He cited an example in his district — a case on San Antonio Street where a couple on fixed incomes saw rents rise sharply — and asked the board to provide tenants a hardship petition path similar to those available for other pass‑through categories.

“This legislation would allow for tenants who have received a pass‑through of a general obligation bond repayment cost from their landlord to petition the Rent Board for just such a hardship waiver,” Peskin said. The ordinance also adds a new “use‑it‑or‑lose‑it” clause for new owners that assume properties, intended to prevent owners from banking multiple years of pass‑throughs and then collecting them in a single charge.

Peskin thanked tenant organizations, the Rent Board and landlord representatives for working on the language. With supervisors registering no objection the item passed its first reading unanimously and will return for final consideration in a later meeting as required for ordinances.

Why it matters: The change aims to reduce sudden, concentrated cost shocks to rent‑controlled households when GO bond debt service is passed through by landlords, and to create a mechanism to address financial hardship for tenants who receive such pass‑throughs.

Votes or formal actions: passed on first reading unanimously (clerk recorded 11 ayes).