Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Events Outdoor Music Festivals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board affirms CEQA exemption for Outside Lands and approves 10-year permit extension after noise debate

3006246 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Supervisors upheld the Planning Department's categorical exemption for the Outside Lands festival and approved a 10-year permit extension for Another Planet Entertainment, after neighbors and acoustical experts urged a numerical noise limit and further environmental review.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on the day of the hearing affirmed the Planning Department's categorical CEQA exemption for the Outside Lands music festival and approved a resolution extending the festival's use permit for an additional 10 years.

Neighbors and acoustical experts told the board they were not opposed to the festival itself but urged an enforceable, numerical decibel limit. Richard Drury, representing appellants Andrew Solo and Steven Summerstein and the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods, said the city requires numerical limits at other Golden Gate Park venues and that Outside Lands has no comparable fixed threshold. “Outside Lands has no numerical noise limit,” Drury said, arguing that a strict decibel standard — for example the sort applied at Sharon Meadow — is necessary so noise can be measured and managed.

Derek Watry, an acoustical consultant with Wilson Airig, said the festival’s current monitoring was reactive and lacked clear, enforceable targets. “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it,” Watry told the board, urging a public environmental review to develop a monitoring and mitigation plan.

Planning department staff defended their CEQA determination. Chelsea Fordham, principal environmental planner, said the department initially found the three-day, temporary festival exempt under CEQA’s Class 4 exemption for minor temporary uses and later determined it also qualified under Class 23 for normal operations at an existing facility. Fordham said the department examined potential noise and transportation impacts and concluded that, while the festival may be an annoyance, the limited three-day annual duration and existing mitigation measures did not create a substantial, long-term increase in ambient noise requiring further review.

Representatives for the Recreation and Park Department and the festival sponsor described a multi-year effort to reduce neighborhood impacts. Dana Ketchum, property and permits director for Rec and Park, described pre-event planning, hotline response procedures, and live sound monitoring aimed at adjusting levels during events. Ketchum said the permit amendment before the board increases minimum monitoring requirements, requires post-event reporting on adjustments, and funds neighborhood mitigation and outreach.

After the hearing process — which included up to 10-minute presentations by appellants and city staff, two-minute public comments from dozens of residents on both sides, technical testimony from acoustic and traffic consultants, and a rebuttal — the board voted to affirm the Planning Department’s categorical exemption and to approve the permit extension and associated amendments.

Votes and motions: Supervisor Jeff Sheehy (President Yee’s substitute on procedural matters) presided over the hearing; Supervisor Scott Wiener and Supervisor Aaron Peskin took leading roles in committee votes earlier in the process. Supervisor London Breed, Mayor's Office representatives, planning and Rec and Park staff and multiple community members participated in the public hearing. The board recorded the CEQA exemption affirmation and the permit amendment as approved unanimously. The permit extension includes requirements for additional monitoring, community hotlines, and neighborhood mitigation funds as described in Rec and Park's presentation.

The board also tabled related items that would have reversed the categorical exemption or directed further CEQA findings (items 29 and 30) and retained the record of the hearing. The sponsors and Rec and Park said they plan further technical analysis this year, including 3-D acoustic modeling, and that the amended permit requires reporting on adjustments made in response to complaints.

Provenance: The public hearing and vote on the CEQA exemption and permit extension were set out in the board's agenda (items 27–31). Voices in the transcript include appellant representative Richard Drury, acoustical consultant Derek Watry, Planning Department Principal Environmental Planner Chelsea Fordham, Rec and Park’s Dana Ketchum, and multiple neighborhood speakers both supporting and opposing the permit extension.