Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board upholds Public Works revocation of 250 Post Street flower-vending permit

3006189 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a two-hour hearing, the Board of Supervisors approved the Department of Public Works' recommendation to revoke the long-standing flower vending permit for 250 Post Street, finding the stand failed to meet required operating and maintenance rules. The vote was 10–1.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday upheld the Department of Public Works’ decision to revoke the flower vending permit for a stand at 250 Post Street, a sidewalk kiosk that has been associated with Union Square area flower sellers for decades.

The board voted 10–1 to approve the director of public works’ order to revoke the permit after hearing testimony from the department, the permit holder’s representative and neighborhood stakeholders. Supervisor Aaron Peskin moved to approve the revocation; Supervisor Sheehy cast the lone no vote.

The central factual dispute at the hearing was whether the kiosk had been “abandoned” under the Public Works Code’s requirements for flower stands. Public Works told the board it had photographic evidence showing the stand had been non-operational and in disrepair for more than a year. “A notice to repair … was issued on 09/01/2016,” Michael Lennon, speaking for Public Works, said. He cited violations of Director’s Order No. 175,880 and the operational minimums in section 2(g) of the street flower market rules, which require a permit holder to maintain “a minimum of 35 operating hours per week and 46 weeks per calendar year.”

The stand’s representative disputed the characterization of abandonment and described a long history of conflict with a neighboring property manager, including interrupted access to utilities and alleged interference with operations. He told the board the stand and family business trace back to the 1950s and asked the supervisors for “fair consideration of the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans