Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisor introduces ordinance to strengthen city whistleblower protections following civil grand jury review
Summary
Supervisor introduced legislation to expand protections for city employees and contractors who report improper governmental activity, including expanding covered complaint types and raising penalties for retaliation.
Supervisor introduced an ordinance on June 14 to amend San Francisco27s whistleblower-protection ordinance following recommendations from the civil grand jury and the Ethics Commission.
The sponsor said the legislation would expand the definition of improper governmental activity to expressly include gross waste, fraud and abuse of city resources; extend protections to city contractors and to persons who file complaints with any city, county, state or federal agency; raise the maximum penalty for retaliation from $5,000 to $10,000; authorize the Ethics Commission to order reversal of retaliatory actions; and strengthen confidentiality and reporting requirements for investigations.
Why it matters: The civil grand jury found that existing local law did not provide sufficient protection for whistleblowers. The proposal is intended to increase reporting of wrongdoing, protect complainants, and bolster departmental accountability for investigations.
What happens next: The sponsor asked colleagues to join in support and introduced the ordinance for committee consideration; the Ethics Commission has adopted companion regulations that the ordinance would render statutory.
Ending: The ordinance reflects a coordinated review from the civil grand jury and the Ethics Commission and, if adopted, will change the city27s legal framework for whistleblower complaints and retaliation remedies.
