Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board splits on equal‑justice resolution; vote fails and item sent to committee
Summary
After a contentious debate over whether to cite local police incidents, the Board of Supervisors failed to adopt a resolution affirming equal justice and support for national policing reforms. The item was sent to committee for further consideration.
The Board of Supervisors on Dec. 16 debated and rejected a resolution that would have affirmed the board’s commitment to “equal justice,” the right to protest and national policing reforms.
Supervisor John Avalos introduced the measure as a broader statement of support for national movements protesting police use of force. The draft included references to national cases and to a local shooting that had prompted community protests.
Several supervisors and dozens of public speakers urged the board to take a strong and explicit stand. Supporters argued the resolution would place the city on record backing national calls for data collection on police shootings, limits on militarized equipment and greater transparency in officer‑involved shootings.
Opponents said parts of the measure unfairly conflated San Francisco police with departments elsewhere and risked prejudging active investigations. Supervisor Malia Cohen proposed amendments that would remove explicit references to ongoing local investigations; that amendment failed on a 5–4 vote. The board then voted on the primary item; it failed, 5–4, and the majority motion to transmit the measure to committee passed.
Why it matters: The vote illustrated sharply differing views among supervisors about how to address national outcry over police conduct — particularly whether the city should single out local incidents or adopt a broader, national statement. Several community members had urged the board to call for or support independent inquiries and naming of officers involved in fatal shootings.
What’s next: The measure was sent to committee for a fuller public discussion. Board members said they expect further hearings and more community engagement before a revised resolution returns.
