Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Special Education History Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and scholars urge Board actions on special-education enforcement and World War II standards during public comment
Summary
During public comment, a parent alleged the department failed to enforce corrective actions for her child with disabilities, and a historian asked the board to revise a World War II standard to include Nazism and Stalinist ideology as primary causes; the board accepted the comments for its record.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Special Education History Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comment at the board meeting included two substantive appeals: one from a parent who said the Virginia Department of Education did not enforce corrective actions after a state complaint related to her child’s special education placement, and a second from a scholar requesting revision of a World War II standard in the history and social science standards.
Parent concerns about corrective actions and access to education: Wendy Little, speaking as a parent, said her child had been placed in a private day school that under‑educated him and that after a successful state complaint the department did not enforce corrective actions. "He has not had education," Little said, describing repeated attempts to secure corrective enforcement and contending the dispute-resolution process had not produced results. Little asked why corrective actions recommended by the department were not enforced and said her child remained without consistent instruction.
History-standard comment: Dr. Jean Sobolowski (listed in the public-comment roster) addressed the board on a draft 2023 standard for World War II (WHII 9) contained in the 2023 Standards of Learning, arguing the item’s phrasing incorrectly centers political and economic causes and omits Nazism’s racial ideology (Lebensraum) and Stalinist ideology. She asked the board to investigate why the advisory committee excluded those ideological causes from the draft standard and to correct the standard to include them.
Board response and next steps: The board accepted both speakers’ remarks into the record. Department staff did not offer an immediate enforcement status update for the special-education complaint in the public meeting; the assertion that corrective actions were not enforced was recorded as public comment. The history standard concern will be part of the public record and may inform future advisory-committee work and review processes.

