Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Real Estate Disclosure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Historic commission hears update on House Bill 1347; members discuss notifying representatives

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commission staff reported that House Bill 1347 advanced to the Senate with amendments that would add a required disclosure for properties in locally designated historic districts and conservation easements; commissioners discussed notifying legislators and neighborhood groups.

Commission staff updated the Historic Preservation Commission on April 9 about progress on House Bill 1347, a real-estate disclosure measure that the commission has discussed in prior meetings.

Staff said the bill advanced from the House to the Senate, was assigned to a Senate committee, received a Senate cosponsor and passed third reading with amendments. Staff explained the amended language includes a proposed Section 8 requiring disclosure that a property is located within a locally designated historic district under IC 36-7-11 and a proposed Section 9 requiring disclosure of a conservation easement as defined in IC 32-23-5-4.

The staff update noted the next procedural steps could include a conference committee if both chambers adopt different language; sometimes the other chamber accepts the amendments and conference is unnecessary. Staff recommended anyone wanting details consult the legislative website (iga.in.gov) for current status and committee schedules.

Commission members discussed whether the commission should notify the city’s state representatives or circulate the update to neighborhood organizations after the commission has reviewed the amended bill language. A commissioner said outreach to representatives and neighborhood email lists "can't hurt" and would be appropriate after the commission reviews the updated version.

No formal action by the commission was recorded on the floor; the discussion closed with staff offering to provide the commission with the current bill text and the suggestion that members review the amendment language before any outreach.