Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Topper Tots topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents and staff push back on Woodland "Topper Tots" changes; board postpones decision to finance meeting
Summary
Parents and staff raised concerns about a proposed tuition increase and a reduction of after‑hours care at the Woodland early childhood program (to be retitled Topper Tots). The board postponed final approval and asked staff for further financial and staffing data at a special finance meeting May 1.
Parents, employees and board members engaged in a lengthy discussion about proposed changes to Woodland Elementary School's early childhood program during the Johnson City School Board meeting. The agenda item would rename Woodland's ECLC program "Topper Tots," increase tuition, and shift operating hours to align with other district sites.
Parent Jane Tester said the proposed changes would affect families' budgets and kindergarten readiness. "This is including a shift in operation hours, a name change, and an increase in tuition," Tester said, adding that the current structure had helped her child make notable academic gains.
LaDawn Hudgins, president of the Johnson City Education Association and a district speech therapist, said many staff who use the program as working parents are concerned by the proposed cost increase. "Many families already have financial challenges... that is a $200 more a month," Hudgins said.
District staff and administrators described the rationale behind the proposal: the program has been running at a deficit, Woodland had different operating times than other sites, and the district sought to align programs and reduce sustained losses. Finance director Leah Valle and district administrators told the board Woodland's program carries a negative fund balance and that the proposed rate change was intended to move the program toward solvency.
Administrators also said the district did not intend to alter the educational content of the pre‑K classroom if the name change proceeds. Dr. (first name not specified) Reich, the educator director at Woodland, said the plan was "to keep the educational standards the same" while aligning program names and hours.
Board members raised multiple practical and equity questions: Who pays when a program runs a deficit? (District staff said the programs are intended to be self‑funded by tuition.) What state staffing ratios apply to mixed age groups? (Administrators noted state ratios such as infants 1:4, toddlers 1:8, preschool 1:10 and that age mixes affect required staffing.) How many children actually stay past 4:30 p.m. at Woodland (the program currently runs to 5:30 p.m.) and what would the fiscal impact be if the district reduced that hour?
A board member proposed a phased increase (an initial $25 weekly increase followed by another $25 the next year) as a compromise, but withdrew the motion and instead moved to postpone final action until the special finance meeting scheduled for May 1 so staff can provide additional enrollment, staffing and budget detail. The motion to postpone carried on a voice vote.
The board asked staff to return to the May 1 finance meeting with: detailed counts of how many children remain after 4:30 p.m. at Woodland; the program's current negative fund balance; a projection of the effect of alternative tuition steps; and the state staffing‑ratio requirements that determine minimum FTEs by age group. The board also requested an updated handbook and clearer public materials explaining the proposed changes before a final vote.
No change to program content was approved at the meeting; the board postponed final action to allow staff to present more complete financial and staffing information.
