Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission endorses Tulsa County Highway 75 comprehensive plan amendment to guide commercial and industrial growth
Summary
The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission recommended approval of a comprehensive plan amendment that creates a Highway 75 planning area for unincorporated Tulsa County to steer future commercial, light-industrial and mixed-use development; commissioners said the change updates an area plan to reflect recent development pressure.
The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission on April 16 recommended adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment that defines a Highway 75 planning area for unincorporated Tulsa County to guide future land use along the corridor.
INCOG planning staff told the commission the amendment updates long-standing county planning maps to reflect recent development interest along Highway 75 and to provide a forward-looking framework for commercial, light-industrial and mixed uses. Staff said the amendment does not change existing zoning but creates a policy vision that would make planned unit development (PUD) processes and higher development standards the preferred route for future projects in the corridor.
Key goals described by staff include discouraging piecemeal variances and special exceptions, encouraging higher-quality site and building standards through the PUD process, ensuring compatibility with adjacent residential areas through setbacks and buffering, acknowledging floodplain and environmental constraints and promoting Highway 75 as an economic hub for warehousing, distribution and light manufacturing where appropriate.
Staff said the amendment is phase 1 of a broader county effort. This phase focuses on the Highway 75 corridor; a second phase will address other unincorporated areas, including lands around Tulsa International Airport and additional West Central Tulsa County areas. Staff recommended approval, concluding the proposal aligns with development trends and municipal plans along the corridor.
Commissioners asked why the amendment was brought forward; staff said recent inquiries for industrial and commercial development prompted the update. One commissioner noted the county’s previous comprehensive plan work and supported the revision. Commissioner Bulmash moved to approve the amendment per staff recommendation; Commissioner Whitlock seconded. The commission approved the amendment with Commissioner Craddock recorded as abstaining.
Staff and county planning partners will continue outreach and refine details during the anticipated PUD process for individual projects; the amendment will serve as a policy guide for zoning and development in the Highway 75 planning area.
