Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Golden Spike Elementary built for energy savings; district reports solar and geothermal cut utility costs
Summary
District facilities staff and the architect reported that Golden Spike Elementary's building envelope, geothermal wells and a photovoltaic array are achieving roughly 85% site energy reduction in the first measured year and should approach the near-zero target over time.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Box Elder School District facilities staff and the project architect briefed the board on Golden Spike Elementary's energy performance, saying the new building's insulated envelope, geothermal well field and a photovoltaic array have produced well below historic district utility costs for similarly sized schools.
Key points from the presentation: The project team described an energy goal of about 90% reduction compared with older schools (a "near-zero" target) and explained why the district aimed to avoid over-producing electricity. The architect said producing more power than the building consumes is inefficient because surplus exported to the grid is purchased back at a much lower rate than the district's retail rate.
Performance in practice: Facilities staff presented a snapshot that showed Golden Spike's combined electricity and gas expense at roughly $35,000 annually for what was described as about 120,000 square feet of new construction (district numbers presented in the meeting packet); the presenters said that works out to roughly 33 cents per square foot, far below some older district buildings in which utility costs approached 80 cents per square foot.
Technical measures: The building uses a white membrane roof, enhanced insulation and thermal-envelope design; a photovoltaic array sized to avoid large exported surpluses; and a ground-source (geothermal) well field beneath a playfield that feeds heat-pump systems. The presenters said the project team sized roof systems and the solar array so roof replacement and panel replacement cycles are aligned, reducing future rework.
Costs and payback: The team said the PV array's estimated payback in the presented scenario was roughly 13 years, with strong sensitivity to local utility rates and technology-cost declines. The architect warned that retrofitting older district buildings to the same standard could be significantly more costly, because older envelopes lose far more energy and would require much more PV area to offset the losses.
Why it matters: The district framed Golden Spike as both an educational facility and an investment in long-term operational savings. Board members asked whether snow and soiling would require manual cleaning of panels; presenters said panels are largely self-cleaning under typical rain cycles and that the safety risks and impracticality of frequent roof cleaning made routine manual cleaning unsuitable for school staff.
Ending: Staff said they will continue to monitor annual energy performance and utility-rate changes and that the district could use lessons from Golden Spike when planning future schools or major renovations.

