Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a glance: Cottage Grove council actions on April 13 — grants, contracts and meeting schedule
Summary
Council approved the consent agenda, accepted a $450 community-trees grant appropriation (Resolution 2165), approved two large change orders on the Cleveland Street CIP, authorized a storm-drainage master-plan contract and canceled the May 26 meeting (Memorial Day). All recorded votes were unanimous.
The Cottage Grove City Council voted on several routine and project items on April 13. Key actions and outcomes:
- Consent agenda: Council approved the consent agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
- Resolution 2165 (grant appropriation): Council adopted Resolution No. 2165 to establish appropriations in the General Fund for an unforeseen specific-purpose grant from Oregon Community Trees in the amount of $450 for marketing and promotion of tree events. Council adopted the resolution by roll call; the motion carried unanimously.
- Storm drainage master plan contract: Council approved a $299,927 contract with Carrillo Engineers Inc. to update the city's 2015 storm drainage system master plan. The cost will be paid from a $300,000 award from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Motion carried unanimously.
- Cleveland Street capital improvement project change orders: Council approved Change Order No. 1 ($226,956.50) to add telecom conduits and water upgrades and Change Order No. 2 ($1,048,262.67) to extend sewer collection lines for future Kathleen Drive and South Third Street. Council approved both change orders unanimously; funds will come from a Senate Bill 1530 appropriation.
- Cancellation of May 26 meeting: Council voted to cancel the May 26, 2025, meeting because it falls on Memorial Day.
All votes recorded in the meeting were carried without recorded opposition.
Speakers and mover/second attributions are drawn from the official meeting record; where the transcript did not specify a mover or seconder by name, the article records the action and outcome without assigning a mover/second.
