Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts 10-year capital plan with new language prioritizing affordable housing
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors adopted a 10-year capital expenditure plan for fiscal years 2020–2029 as amended to formalize intentions to elevate affordable housing in city capital planning and to ask the Capital Planning Committee to work with housing experts on bonding and funding strategies.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on April 30 adopted the city's 10‑year capital expenditure plan for fiscal years 2020–2029 as amended to formally highlight affordable housing as a priority for the capital planning process.
Supervisor Matt Haney, who introduced the amendments, said the changes were meant to “add our intention for affordable housing to be a key part of our capital plan, moving forward.” Haney said the amendments instruct the Capital Planning Committee to work with housing policy experts to build a reliable set of funding sources for affordable housing, including—she said—“at least a billion dollars over 10 years.”
The amendments, which Haney described as non‑substantive for the purpose of passing the plan on the required schedule, direct staff to collaborate with the Capital Planning Committee and housing policy experts to identify funding sources and to integrate affordable housing into the capital planning process beginning next year.
Supervisor Brown seconded the motion to adopt the plan as amended. The board adopted the resolution as amended without further changes.
What the board did and why it matters: the capital plan sets multi‑year priorities for public buildings, infrastructure, and long‑term projects. By inserting explicit direction to prioritize affordable housing and to coordinate with housing policy experts, the board signaled a policy priority and a process to develop funding options—such as a potential future housing bond—during the city's capital planning cycle.
Implementation and limits: the board's action added direction to the capital planning process; it did not itself appropriate new bond authority or commit city funds beyond what is included in the plan. Haney framed the $1 billion figure as an advocacy target rather than a binding commitment. The amendments ask the Capital Planning Committee to produce funding options and to work with housing experts, which will inform future budget and bond decisions.
Votes and next steps: the resolution was adopted as amended during the April 30 meeting. The amendment directs follow‑up work by the Capital Planning Committee and by city housing policy staff; any future bond proposal or appropriations would return to the board for separate approvals.
