Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves $30M Microsoft cloud contract amid objections from open‑source advocates
Summary
The Board approved a three‑year agreement (not to exceed $30 million) for Microsoft cloud software and enterprise products, drawing recorded dissent from Supervisors Kim and Peskin who raised concerns about vendor lock‑in, sole‑source buying and missed open‑source opportunities.
Get email alerts on the Public Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Supervisors on June 6 adopted a resolution authorizing the Department of Technology and the Office of Contract Administration to enter an agreement with PCMG, Inc. for Microsoft cloud software and enterprise products for a three‑year term (06/01/2017–05/31/2020) in an amount not to exceed $30,000,000.
Supervisor Jane Kim registered a recorded “no” and explained her dissent on the floor. Kim said she has previously opposed large licensed‑software contracts (citing Oracle/Accenture) and urged the city to pursue open‑source alternatives to reduce long‑term licensing costs and contractual lock‑in. Kim referenced a 2014 BLA report showing substantial city spending on licensed software and warned that long contracts make it difficult for municipalities to wean themselves from vendor dependency. Supervisor Aaron Peskin joined Kim in the dissent; the clerk recorded nine ayes and two no votes, with Kim and Peskin voting no.
Supporters of the contract said the agreement would allow the city to procure widely used enterprise cloud software for city departments and that procurement is necessary to support ongoing city IT needs. The clerk recorded the final tally as nine ayes and two nos, and the resolution was adopted.
Nut graf: The board authorized a multi‑million‑dollar Microsoft cloud agreement needed for current enterprise systems, but two supervisors publicly dissented, urging more aggressive exploration of open‑source alternatives and criticizing sole‑source purchasing practices.
Background and next steps: The Department of Technology and Office of Contract Administration will execute the agreement with PCMG, Inc.; the resolution had been reviewed in committee and forwarded for final action. Supervisors who voted no signaled they will continue to press for policy changes promoting open‑source options and reducing sole‑source contract reliance.
Ending: The contract authorization enables city departments to move forward with enterprise cloud purchases while keeping open the policy debate about open‑source adoption and procurement practices.
