Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Earthquake Safety Bond topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances earthquake‑safety bond, tables larger bond and secures streetlight funding agreement
Summary
The Board moved forward two bond items for earthquake safety and emergency response while tabling a related larger bond; supervisors and city staff reached an agreement to increase near‑term streetlight capital funding and to produce a comprehensive assessment by April.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors moved forward portions of a package of general‑obligation bonds for earthquake safety and emergency response after a heated public hearing and interdepartmental negotiations over streetlight funding.
Supervisor Scott Wiener, who proposed adding $25 million for streetlight capital needs to the bond, ultimately reached an agreement with the mayor’s office, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and the controller’s office. Under the agreement announced on the floor, the PUC and mayor’s office will include approximately $5 million for streetlight replacement and repair in the fiscal 2014–15 budget and an additional $4 million in fiscal 2015–16, for a two‑year total of about $9 million. The parties also committed to a citywide assessment of streetlight capital needs and a multi‑year plan to be delivered by April and integrated into the capital plan.
Wiener said the PUC historically underinvested in streetlights and that the system has “huge deferred capital needs.” Todd Reichstrom, assistant general manager and CFO of the PUC, confirmed the agreement on funding and said further capital‑planning discussions would follow as part of the regular budget and capital‑planning process.
After the agreement, Supervisor Wiener moved that items 16 and 17 be advanced and that items 18 and 19 be tabled to allow additional discussion. The board voted 11–0 to move forward with that motion; the clerk recorded 11 ayes and the minutes show the ordinance was passed on first reading and the resolution adopted (board roll call recorded on the motion). The votes followed the public hearing in which members of the public urged prompt action on seismic upgrades and lighting.
Supporters argued the bonds would finance seismic retrofits and emergency‑response facilities; opponents and some speakers urged greater transparency and targeted spending. Public comment emphasized the link between street lighting, public safety and economic activity in neighborhoods; several residents described local dark spots and requested faster repairs.
The board’s action advances selected earthquake‑safety and emergency‑response appropriations while deferring larger or alternative bond proposals for further review and negotiation with the administration.
