Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board advances citywide park hours ordinance after hours-long debate
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved on first reading an ordinance to set citywide park hours from 5 a.m. to midnight, with neighborhood exceptions and added reporting and enforcement provisions after heated debate over impacts on homeless residents and enforcement capacity.
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to approve on first reading an ordinance establishing uniform citywide park hours of 5 a.m. to midnight, with carve-outs for specific plazas and flexibility for the Recreation and Park Commission to set different hours when warranted.
Supporters said the measure aims to reduce vandalism and illegal dumping that Rec and Park staff say occur overnight; opponents said it would criminalize people who shelter in parks and exacerbate displacement without addressing enforcement or housing shortages.
The measure’s sponsor, Supervisor Scott Wiener, told the Board the ordinance responds to repeated vandalism and illegal dumping. Wiener said Rec and Park staff “leave work and everything is fine and return at 6 a.m. or so, and things are trashed,” and argued San Francisco was an outlier among large cities in lacking a codified baseline for park hours. He added the ordinance includes exceptions for streets and adjacent sidewalks that cross parks and for plazas such as Union Square and Civic Center Plaza.
Supervisor Norman Yee offered amendments requiring the department to prioritize nighttime staffing, to target enforcement first to small neighborhood parks and playgrounds, and to produce annual reports documenting citations, locations and enforcement costs. Yee said the city should “prioritize staffing at nighttime” and support additional resources for Rec and Park.
Opponents said the ordinance would disproportionately affect homeless residents and could be selectively enforced. Supervisor David Campos called the measure “the Sit-Lie for parks,” saying San Francisco lacks the shelter capacity that similar ordinances assume (he cited New York’s statutory shelter obligations). Supervisor John Avalos, Supervisor Eric Mar and others stressed existing park code already prohibits camping and sleeping and that the city’s real problem is enforcement capacity: park patrol had only a few officers on duty each night for thousands of acres.
Rec and Park General Manager Phil Ginsberg told the Board the department currently has about 18–19 full‑time park rangers and had recently added 4–5 park patrol officers. He described park patrol as performing many non‑enforcement functions—ambassadorial duties, special-event support, bathroom openings and more—and agreed the ordinance is primarily a tool to deter vandalism when resources are thin. SFPD Chief Greg Suhr (transcript: “Chief Sur”) and other public‑safety witnesses also took questions about enforcement and implementation.
The Board adopted several last‑minute amendments, including language drafted to ensure the general manager’s authority to close parks conforms with existing First Amendment protections. Supervisors also adopted an amendment to avoid citing people encountered sleeping in the park under the new after‑hours provision if they qualify for the existing sleeping‑in‑park citation process (i.e., the person may be cited under the sleeping section but not under the new after‑hours section when encountered sleeping).
After debate and multiple roll‑call statements, the Board approved the ordinance on first reading as amended. The roll call showed Yi, Breed, Chu, Farrell, Tang and Weiner voting aye; Avalos, Campos, Cohen, Kim and Mar voting no. The Clerk recorded: “There are 6 ayes and 5 noes. This ordinance is passed on the first reading as amended.”
The ordinance now returns to the Board for a subsequent reading and final passage; several supervisors said they will press for additional resources for Rec and Park staffing and for continuing oversight of enforcement to track for selective enforcement patterns.
Ending: The Board’s first‑reading approval sets a uniform legal baseline for park opening and closing times, but key practical issues—enforcement staffing, displacement impacts on unhoused residents, and neighborhood‑level exceptions—will remain central in follow‑up hearings and during implementation.
