Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor Licenses Surveillance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors split over surveillance camera condition on liquor licenses; one license approved, another continued
Summary
Board debate over a police-recommended condition to require on‑site surveillance and 30‑day retention for liquor establishments divided supervisors. Item 16 (34 Mason Street) passed 10–1 with a camera condition; Item 17 (555 Howard Street) was continued two weeks for further review and outreach to SFPD.
The Board of Supervisors debated whether to include a police‑recommended condition requiring electronic surveillance of a premises’ exterior entrances and 30‑day retention of recordings in individual liquor‑license approvals.
Supervisor Scott Wiener objected to the practice of adding broad surveillance conditions to licenses on an item‑by‑item basis and said mandating cameras across applications without a citywide policy was inappropriate. "I don't believe that this condition should be included," Wiener said, adding that mandatory recording raises privacy concerns for patrons — particularly for LGBT patrons who may not want to be recorded.
Supervisor London Breed, Supervisor Jane Kim and other district supervisors supported the condition for specific locations where merchants and residents had requested added safety measures. Supervisor Malia Cohen framed it as a public‑safety tool in neighborhoods with concentrated problems; Supervisor Kim said, for 34 Mason Street, the applicant had agreed voluntarily to install cameras.
On roll call, the Board approved Item 16 (a license with a surveillance condition) with 10 ayes and 1 no (Weiner). For Item 17 (a Type 42 on‑sale beer and wine license at 555 Howard Street), Supervisor Kim moved to continue the item two weeks to allow further discussion with SFPD and the applicant; the motion to continue was seconded and carried without objection (continued to April 16).
Supervisors expressed a desire to convene a broader policy discussion on when surveillance conditions are appropriate and whether the retention and disclosure language should be narrowed to require release only for crime investigations rather than on demand. President Chiu recommended asking SFPD to refine their recommendation language so it is more narrowly tailored to crime investigations and to consider destruction schedules.
Speakers who addressed the surveillance condition included Supervisor Scott Wiener, Supervisor Malia Cohen, Supervisor Jane Kim, Supervisor Eric Mar (remarks in support), Supervisor Campos, and other district supervisors. The Police Department’s inspection language and the applicants’ statements were referenced in committee records.
Actions at a glance: Item 16 — resolution approving liquor-license conditions including surveillance, adopted (10 ayes, 1 no). Item 17 — resolution continued for two weeks for further review (continued to April 16).
