Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board of Supervisors approves nomination of Supervisor Ross Mercremi to California Coastal Commission

3005925 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a special April 2011 meeting, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved the nomination of Supervisor Ross Mercremi to the North Coast Central seat on the California Coastal Commission. Mercremi was excused from the vote and the nomination passed on an 8-0 roll call.

At a special meeting of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in April 2011 (exact day not specified), the board approved the nomination of Supervisor Ross Mercremi to the North Coast Central seat on the California Coastal Commission. The board recorded an 8-0 roll call in favor after Mercremi was excused from participating in the vote.

The meeting began with the clerk calling the roll and confirming a quorum. Supervisor Farrell made a motion to excuse colleagues who were not present; Supervisor McRamey seconded the motion, which was approved without objection. The clerk then read Item No. 1: “a motion nominating Supervisor Ross Mercremi for the North Coast Central Seat on the California Coastal.”

Before the roll call on the nomination, the board moved to recuse Supervisor Ross Mercremi from the item. Supervisor Ellsberg moved to excuse Mercremi from participating; Supervisor Kim seconded. The recusal was approved “without objection,” and Mercremi did not participate in the subsequent roll-call vote.

The clerk conducted a roll-call vote on the nomination. The President (presiding officer) and Supervisors Cohen, Ellsberg, Farrell, Kim, Mar, Wiener and Kompa recorded “aye.” The clerk stated there were eight ayes and declared the motion approved.

There was no public comment on the item during the general public-comment period. The board then moved to other business and adjourned the meeting.