Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Entertainment Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors approve changes to entertainment permit rules, carve-out on extended hours draws split vote
Summary
After months of committee work and extended debate, the Board approved ordinances to amend the police code governing place-of-entertainment permits and extended-hours permits; supervisors retained a 15% annual cap on growth of extended-hour permits in a separate roll-call with one no vote.
The Board of Supervisors on Nov. 3 voted to amend the police code to revise place-of-entertainment permits, board of appeals procedures and rules governing extended-hours premises permits, including changes to penalties.
Supporters described the legislation as a compromise intended to give the Entertainment Commission additional enforcement tools while balancing neighborhood quality-of-life concerns and the city's nighttime economy. Supervisor Dufty said the package "provid[es] meaningful tools to the entertainment commission" to address establishments with problems and help ensure responsible operators are rewarded.
The board considered a proposed separate provision (section 1070.36) that would impose a cap on the growth in extended-hour permits. Supervisor Daley asked that that section be severed for a separate vote. Daley and others argued a cap was appropriate because the streamlined permit process could otherwise lead to rapid growth in extended-hour permits amid concerns about late-night violence; Daley described a 15% per-year cap as "appropriate" and said the entertainment industry had signaled support for that limitation.
The board first voted on the severed portion, section 1070.36. The roll-call produced 10 ayes and 1 no; the clerk announced "There are 10 ayes, 1 no." The board then voted on the remaining package (items 16 and 17) as a group; that vote also recorded 10 ayes and 1 no and the clerk stated the ordinances "are passed in the first reading." Supervisor Ellsberg cast the no on the package vote; Supervisor Daly cast the no on the severed portion vote.
Several supervisors said they would monitor implementation closely. Supervisor Chu told the board the Entertainment Commission will be required under the legislation to report quarterly to the public and the board on how complaints are being resolved; he said he plans hearings at the Public Safety Committee to track outcomes.
Outcome: The ordinances passed in first reading. The severed cap provision (section 1070.36) remained in the ordinance after the separate roll-call vote, but saw at least one dissenting vote. The board signaled ongoing oversight through quarterly reporting requirements and potential future hearings.
Implementation notes: The legislation gives the Entertainment Commission new enforcement and permitting tools and requires the commission to provide quarterly public updates on complaint resolution; supervisors indicated they will review outcomes in hearings going forward.
