Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves David Snyder for Golden Gate Bridge District after heated debate over labor representation
Summary
After a contentious, multi-hour debate over whether the seat should remain a labor-appointed position, the Board of Supervisors voted 6–5 to amend the appointment and approve David Snyder to the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District seat previously discussed in committee.
After more than two hours of debate on competing motions and a failed continuance, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved an amended motion to appoint David Snyder to a public-at-large seat on the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District.
The vote on the underlying appointment, as amended to name Snyder, passed 6–5. Supporters argued Snyder brings deep transportation expertise and can “hit the ground running”; opponents said the seat has a long tradition of labor representation and pressed for a candidate endorsed by organized labor.
Why it matters: The Golden Gate Bridge District oversees the bridge, ferry and bus services and large capital works. Supervisors who argued for labor representation said the district’s construction and maintenance work benefits from labor voices. Those who favored Snyder said the agency needs technical transit and project-execution expertise given the region’s constrained transportation budgets.
Board discussion and motions: Supervisor Chris Daly, who moved for Snyder’s appointment, described Snyder as “the most qualified applicant” with decades of transportation experience, including leading nonprofit transportation advocacy organizations. Supervisor Dufty proposed a two-week continuance to allow additional dialogue with labor; that motion failed. Supervisor Mark Farrell (note: transcript name variations) and others urged deference to the rules committee’s prior hearings but ultimately the board amended the motion to fill the appointment with Snyder’s name and voted on the amended motion.
Labor seat debate: Supervisors Ellsburn and others (speakers recorded as expressing strong support for a labor representative) argued the Bridge District historically has been represented by appointees from the building trades and that labor advocates had been insufficiently engaged in producing an alternative candidate. Supporters of Snyder acknowledged the value of labor representation but said no labor-backed nominee had the combination of transportation knowledge and readiness shown by Snyder.
Outcome and next steps: The amended appointment passed 6–5. Several supervisors said they intend to continue outreach to organized labor ahead of the next vacancy and to consider options for increasing labor representation across various boards and commissions.
Votes at a glance: The board voted on two competing procedural motions (a continuance motion and a motion to table an amendment); the continuance failed 5–6, a motion to amend to insert Snyder’s name passed 6–5, and the final motion as amended passed 6–5.
Attribution: Direct quotes and attributions in this article come from the Board of Supervisors' hearing transcript and the named supervisors who spoke during the item 20 debate.
