Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 601 Debose Environmental Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors approve amended findings to reverse approval of mitigated negative declaration for 601 Debose Avenue
Summary
The Board adopted amended findings reversing the Planning Commission's approved mitigated negative declaration for the 601 Debose Avenue project, with Supervisor Ammiano's amendment adopted and Supervisor Dufty recused.
Get email alerts on the 601 Debose Environmental Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Oct. 2 adopted findings related to reversing the Planning Commission's approval of a mitigated negative declaration for the 601 Debose Avenue project, adopting an amendment that narrows language about the adequacy of environmental review.
Supervisor Ammiano moved to amend the draft findings by striking specified quoted language through a referenced phrase and to retain language leaving certain determinations to a future hearing when CPMC's larger plan has been completed. Supervisor McGoldrick seconded the amendment. The roll call vote on the item as amended recorded 10 ayes; Supervisor Dufty was recused from the matter.
The amendment targeted language on page 2, line 10 of the findings and sought to preserve deference to future hearings concerning CPMC’s larger campus plan. Ammiano said the amendment codified points made by colleagues during the hearing and left determinations of adequacy to a subsequent process tied to CPMC’s overall plan.
After the amendment was moved and seconded, the board took a roll call. Supervisors voting aye included Sandoval, Aliotta Pier, Ammiano, Chu, Daly, Elsburn, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Mercarimi and Peskin. The chair announced the motion was approved as amended.
Supervisor Dufty was recorded as recused on the item. The board’s action reverses the Planning Commission’s prior environmental determination and adopts the Board’s findings as amended; the transcript records the amended adoption and the roll call tally but does not include further project details such as subsequent hearings or the Planning Department’s written response.
The adoption requires follow-up steps in committee or subsequent hearings to determine the environmental adequacy of any revised project materials and to coordinate with CPMC’s broader campus planning process.
