Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Employment Practices topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board adopts resolution on workplace mobbing, asks DHR to study policy options within 60 days

3005740 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution recognizing workplace mobbing (psychological harassment) and requested the Department of Human Resources to assess how such behavior could be addressed in city policy and to report back within 60 days after debate over whether to send the measure to committee.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Jan. 23 adopted a resolution recognizing the detrimental effects of workplace “mobbing” (psychological harassment) and asking the Department of Human Resources (DHR) to assess whether and how the city’s harassment policies could address such conduct.

Supervisor Sandoval introduced the resolution, saying psychological harassment — including intimidation, humiliation and isolation — is a serious problem for city employees that often goes unaddressed because it falls outside protected-class harassment definitions. Several public speakers, city employees and representatives of labor and advocacy groups urged the board not to delay the item and emphasized health and productivity harms associated with workplace bullying.

Some supervisors argued the resolution required committee review to define terms and avoid unintended consequences; Supervisor Ellsburn and others recommended DHR be asked to study options rather than immediately to adopt new policy language. After motions and public comment, the board adopted an amended version of the resolution requesting that DHR assess and recommend ways to address mobbing and all forms of psychological harassment and report to the board within 60 days. DHR’s acting director, Ted Yamasaki, told the board the department supports the concept but requested committee time to vet policy options; the board instead asked DHR for a time‑limited report.

The adopted measure asks DHR to evaluate possible policy changes, including the definitions and enforcement mechanisms needed to address workplace psychological harassment while safeguarding against abuse of new policies. Public testimony included multiple city employees describing personal experiences of workplace bullying; labor representatives also urged immediate board action rather than a long committee delay.