Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civilian Review Board topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County counsel: Milwaukee may create civilian review board but it would be advisory
Summary
An informational analysis from Milwaukee County corporation counsel says the county may establish a civilian review board to advise on sheriff's policies but such a board would have limited authority over the constitutionally-elected sheriff. The committee received the report and placed it on file.
Milwaukee County’s Office of the Corporation Counsel told the Judiciary, Law Enforcement and General Services Committee that the county may lawfully establish a civilian review board (CRB) to advise on policing policies and practices, but the board would have limited power to compel action by the Milwaukee County Sheriff.
Key point: The county may create an advisory civilian review board, but it cannot compel the sheriff — a separately elected constitutional officer — to comply with board recommendations or to cede operational authority.
What the counsel told the committee A deputy from the corporation counsel's office summarized the report and answered committee questions: a CRB could be constituted as an advisory body, its meetings and records would be subject to Wisconsin open-meetings and public-records laws, and careful structuring would be required to maximize effectiveness while limiting legal exposure to the county.
Committee discussion and public comment Supervisors and public speakers discussed design choices for a potential CRB, including member appointment methods, record custody, reporting requirements and whether to pilot a board. Public commentators and advocacy groups urged an independent oversight body rather than an advisory panel appointed solely by the sheriff. The committee also heard from the Milwaukee Turners’ research and advocacy representative, who urged independent civilian oversight in light of recent jail audit findings.
Formal action On a motion by Supervisor Juan Miguel Martinez, the committee voted to receive and place the corporation counsel report on file. The motion passed 5–0. Several supervisors suggested drafting a future resolution to create a CRB that follows the legal guardrails identified in the counsel’s opinion.
Ending note: Corporation counsel and supervisors noted the sheriff’s office has separately announced a proposed advisory board; counsel highlighted that any board created by an appointing authority becomes a public body subject to open records and open meetings law.
